Raydium vs Abcc: Fees, Security, Features & Which to Choose (2025)

Trying to choose between Raydium and Abcc This side-by-side comparison reveals total cost (fees + spreads), security & licenses, coins/derivatives, deposits/withdrawals, and app quality. In 2 minutes you’ll see who wins for beginners, active traders, and long-term holders. Clear pros/cons, a quick verdict, and safe links to get started.

Last updated on September 7, 2025

Raydium

Abcc

⚠️ We look for what’s best for you.

₿ Getting into crypto? With eToro you can start in minutes: buy/sell top coins, set recurring buys, track markets, and use Social/CopyTrader features.

👉 Start here and explore the crypto offer.

Available Countries

United States

Europe

Yes

Latin America

Yes

India

Yes

China

Yes

Canada

United Kingdom

Yes

United States

Europe

Latin America

India

China

Canada

United Kingdom

Thinking about starting with crypto? This is for you.

In select regions, eToro offers a $10 welcome bonus when you open an account today.*

🎯 An account built to help you start with crypto—without the hassle.

➕ Buy and sell top cryptocurrencies in minutes

➕ Recurring buys, price alerts, and advanced charts

➕ Social/CopyTrader™ to follow experienced investors

➕ One of the largest and most trusted platforms worldwide

Limited-time promotion — still available.

*Offer subject to terms, eligibility and regional availability. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest.

Raydium is ideal if:

If you thrive in the Solana ecosystem, Raydium’s high-speed, low-cost swaps and deep liquidity integration make it a natural fit.
If you're focused on strategic DeFi participation, its Fusion Pools and community-driven token offerings offer advanced, flexible yield opportunities.
If you value non-custodial trading with order-book precision, Raydium’s hybrid AMM design delivers professional execution without sacrificing decentralization.

Abcc is ideal if:

Active traders who value speed and simplicity — ABCC shines with a straightforward trading-focused environment, especially for those placing frequent trades.
Tech-savvy users comfortable without passive income options — It lacks staking, referral, or yield features, so it’s tailored for direct trading only.
Users seeking ease with familiar interfaces — The platform offers an intuitive TradingView-based terminal and seamless fiat crypto deposits, making onboarding hassle-free.

Raydium isn’t ideal if:

If you prefer multi-chain access, Raydium’s strong Solana reliance may feel limiting compared to DEXs that support Ethereum, BNB Chain, or others.
If transparency matters deeply to you, Raydium’s largely anonymous founding team can raise concerns about long-term accountability.
If you prioritize ultra-robust security, ongoing DeFi exploit risks and Solana-dependency may be a deterrent despite audits.

Abcc isn’t ideal if:

Not suited for passive-income seekers — Lacks features like staking, referrals, yield or investment programs, making it less appealing for users wanting to earn beyond trading.
Limited altcoin depth and liquidity — Offers a basic roster of digital assets and modest trading volume compared to more prominent exchanges, which might limit your options.
Customer support and transparency concerns — User feedback highlights issues with withdrawals, support responsiveness, and limited operational clarity—potentially frustrating if support matters to you.

Fees & Total Costs

Spot Maker/Take

fee tiers & native-token discounts Raydium applies a straightforward spot trading fee (maker and taker both), typically around 0.25%, with pools varying based on design—some concentrated-liquidity or specialty pools offer lower tiers down to 0.01%, and fees funnel back into liquidity rewards and RAY buybacks, though no explicit discount for using RAY is mentioned in their core documentation.

ABCC maintains a flat trading fee structure—0.10 % for both makers and takers when trading through the standard interface, with reduced rates of 0.05 % available via API access; there’s no tiered volume structure or explicit discounts tied to holding the AT token, although API usage and AT holdings can indirectly influence cost savings.

Futures/Derivatives

maker/taker & funding During its futures/perpetuals beta phase via the Orderly Network, Raydium offered remarkably low costs—0% maker fees and 0.025% taker fees—supported by Solana’s gas-free environment; funding rates weren’t prominently disclosed, suggesting they might align with market norms or be negotiated per contract.

ABCC currently does not offer futures or derivatives trading, so there are no associated maker/taker fees or funding rate mechanics to consider—its services remain focused solely on spot markets.

Average Spreads on Liquid Pairs

Thanks to its AMM structure integrated with the OpenBook order book, Raydium delivers competitive pricing and tight spreads on high-liquidity pairs like BTC/USDT or ETH/USDT, leveraging deep order flow to minimize slippage and price impact for traders.

ABCC quotes market spreads that align with live order-book depths, generally competitive for liquid pairs like BTC/USDT or ETH/USDT, making its trading environment practical for access to those key markets, though actual spread values fluctuate with market conditions and aren’t fixed.

Fiat Deposits & Withdrawals

Raydium does not support fiat on-ramps or off-ramps—it operates strictly in crypto, so users must first acquire assets on other platforms; this means no direct methods, no fiat fees or timing to report, as all funding must occur via SPL-compatible wallets.

Fiat transfers occur via third-party OTC partners—users must complete KYC to access USD deposit and withdrawal options, with wire times typically ranging from 1 to 5 business days; ABCC charges a handling fee on USD withdrawals—specifically 3 % of the requested amount (with no fixed component), and any additional bank or intermediary charges depend on the user’s banking institutions.

On-chain Withdrawals

Withdrawals on Raydium only incur blockchain network (“gas”) fees, which are dynamic depending on Solana network pressure; there’s no fixed withdrawal fee from the protocol itself, so you only pay the variable SOL-based cost for execution.

Cryptocurrency withdrawals incur network-specific fees that ABCC displays on the assets page—these vary by blockchain (e.g., BTC, ETH, TRX) and are dynamically set according to current network conditions rather than being fixed, ensuring cost reflects real-time congestion.

Hidden Costs

There are essentially no hidden or extra fees on Raydium—no conversion or inactivity charges and no KYC express or expedited processing costs—since user assets remain self-custodied, and the protocol maintains a fully decentralized, permissionless stance without such financial add-ons.

ABCC doesn’t charge explicit inactivity or express-KYC fees, but users should be aware that conversion costs may arise if engaging in fiat pair trading where implied FX is applied, and third-party bank fees on fiat transfers may create indirect, less obvious expenses beyond the advertised 3 % handling rate.

Real-World Cost Example: “€500 BTC

Imagine buying €500 worth of BTC via Raydium: you’d first swap an equivalent amount of crypto—incurring a ~0.25% swap fee plus minimal slippage—then withdraw BTC to your wallet, paying only the on-chain SOL network fee; there’s no fiat fee, and all costs stay modest and transparent.

If you were to fund €500 via fiat (converted through OTC into USDC or USDT) and then purchase BTC, your cost breakdown would include the 3 % fiat handling fee (about €15), a trading fee of 0.10 % on the purchase (approx. €0.50), and then any subsequent withdrawal would incur a dynamic network fee depending on your chosen blockchain—resulting in a total cost of roughly €15.50 plus the applicable on-chain fee.

Crypto Offering & Trading Features

Number of Coins & Pairs

Raydium supports over a thousand SPL-based tokens and boasts more than a thousand trading pairs, while its top 20 pairs by volume typically include heavy hitters within the Solana ecosystem with significant liquidity and trade activity.

ABCC lists around 20–30 digital assets, including major coins like BTC, ETH, LINK, DOT, AAVE, and more, typically paired with stablecoins such as USDT and USDC; the top 20 by volume closely align with these key tokens.

Product Range

Raydium delivers core DeFi services such as spot swaps, staking, yield farming, token launchpad (AcceleRaytor), concentrated liquidity provisioning (Fusion Pools), and perpetual futures trading—all within a self-custodial, on-chain environment.

ABCC offers spot trading only—there’s no access to margin, futures, perpetuals, options, ETFs, staking, lending, copy-trading, grid bots, or automated DCA options.

Liquidity

24h Volume & Book Depth Raydium often records daily volumes in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, supported by combined pool and order-book liquidity, which ensures ample depth—especially for major assets like BTC-SOL or ETH-SOL equivalents on Solana.

The platform’s liquidity is modest—daily trading volume is quite low (often just a few dozen dollars to a few thousand across pairs) and order book depth for BTC/ETH is limited, meaning price impact may be more pronounced for larger trades.

Tools

Users benefit from advanced trading features like limit orders, integration with OpenBook’s on-chain order book, real-time trading analytics, and straightforward interaction via wallet-connected interfaces, though classic charting tools like TradingView aren’t native.

You get a capable suite of tools including multiple order types (like limit, stop, OCO), real-time alerts, a TradingView-powered charting interface, and API/WebSocket access—all lending solid technical support for active spot traders.

Geographic Restrictions by Product

Certain decentralized features of Raydium—especially derivatives or token launches—may be inaccessible to residents of restricted territories such as the U.S. and others, while core swapping and staking remain broadly available

While ABCC is accessible globally, certain features—like its token sales or AT-related promotions—may be unavailable or restricted in jurisdictions such as the US, China, or Singapore, depending on local rules.

Innovation

Raydium stands out with its permissionless launchpad for token offerings and the option for flexible vs locked staking; launch initiatives like AcceleRaytor and concentrated liquidity pools offer dynamic ways to participate in emerging projects.

ABCC includes occasional IEOs (initial exchange offerings), enabling users to participate in token launches, but it does not provide flexible or locked earn options (like staking or yield pools) as part of its products.

Security, Regulation & Custody

Operating Entity & Jurisdiction

Raydium is developed by a decentralized team operating under Solana’s framework, without a publicly registered corporate entity or formal headquarters, reflecting typical DeFi protocol structure.

ABCC is legally operated by Alphabit Consulting Pte Ltd, incorporated in Singapore and founded in 2018; it previously had subsidiaries in Malta and Gibraltar, though it has since announced plans to consolidate and sunset operations in Singapore.

Licenses/Registration

The protocol does not hold formal regulatory licenses like VASP or MiCA registration, operating instead as a permissionless DeFi platform without centralized oversight.

The platform does not hold formal regulatory licenses like VASP or MiCA-equivalents, though it has publicly expressed support for and applied to DLT licensing regimes in jurisdictions such as Malta and Gibraltar to align with regulatory clarity initiatives.

Custody

Users retain full self-custody of their assets with no third-party custody; while audits and bug bounty programs bolster confidence, there’s no published proof of reserves or specified cold storage ratio.

ABCC retains custody of user assets using a hybrid model—likely combining internal systems with cold storage—yet it does not publish any proof-of-reserves data or conduct third-party reserve audits, leaving the ratio of cold vs. hot reserve holdings unclear.

Insurance & Protection Funds

There’s no on-chain insurance or formally designated protection fund from Raydium—risk mitigation relies on community governance, audits, and bounty incentives rather than external insurance mechanisms.

ABCC does not offer any explicit user insurance or protection funds; there’s no mention of coverage against hacks or insolvency, meaning user assets are not guaranteed beyond the self-custodial structure of the exchange.

Incident History

In late 2022, Raydium suffered a significant liquidity exploit (~$5M) due to a private key compromise, after which emergency governance steps and DAO-funded compensation were enacted to address losses.

Since its 2018 launch, ABCC has not suffered any major public hacks or asset losses, and there have been no recorded suspensions or regulatory sanctions—so its historical incident record remains clean at this time.

Risk Controls

Smart contracts are controlled via upgradeable programs safeguarded by Squads multisig; there’s an active bug bounty system, but typical end-user protections like 2FA, whitelists, or API permission tiers are not part of its non-custodial design.

The exchange supports security measures such as two-factor authentication, withdrawal address whitelisting, anti-phishing tools, and granular API key permissions; it also automatically freezes withdrawals for a short delay after key changes like password or 2FA updates to reduce risk.

Transparency

The platform maintains visible on-chain admin controls, regular audit disclosures, and governance updates, but does not provide formal monthly reports or SLAs—transparency is primarily through protocol documentation and community channels.

ABCC does not publish monthly transparency reports, nor does it provide publicly auditable wallet addresses or service-level guarantees; its transparency is limited to periodic announcements and standard user-facing FAQs without formal compliance reporting.

Deposits, Withdrawals, KYC & Support

Fiat Deposit Methods

Raydium does not support any fiat deposit methods—no bank transfer, card, or e-wallet options—so users must initially acquire crypto elsewhere before interacting with the protocol.

ABCC allows fiat deposits via local bank transfers through trusted partners like Circle and Fomopay; card payments or e-wallets are not supported. After completing KYC, users bind their bank account in a few days, then funds typically take 1–5 business days to arrive. While ABCC doesn’t enforce a fixed minimum, successful transfers often start around the equivalent of $10.

Supported Fiat Currencies & Conversion

Raydium does not support any fiat deposit methods—no bank transfer, card, or e-wallet options—so users must initially acquire crypto elsewhere before interacting with the protocol.

KYC (Verification Levels)

Being a decentralized protocol, Raydium requires no KYC at any level—there are no identity verification steps, thus no transaction limits or tiers tied to KYC status.

ABCC operates a tiered KYC structure—Basic (no fiat or crypto deposits/withdrawals), Standard, Premier, and Prestige—with increasing withdrawal and deposit limits at each stage. The Basic level offers minimal functionality, while higher tiers unlock higher monthly and daily limits for both crypto and fiat flows.

Withdrawals

Limits, Timing & Networks

Crypto withdrawals are permitted once KYC’s completed, with limits aligned to your KYC tier; withdrawal times and fee rates depend on the chosen blockchain (e.g., ERC20 or TRC20) and network congestion, with no flat-rate cap visible to users prior to initiating a withdrawal.

Customer Support

Raydium offers support through a help center, email, and active community forums like Discord and Telegram, but does not provide 24/7 live chat or guaranteed response times.

Support is available via email and a ticket system through the Help Center—24/7 live chat isn’t offered. Users typically rely on FAQs and guides for immediate answers, with email responses generally provided within a few business hours to a day depending on volume.

Languages & Localization

Raydium’s interface is primarily provided in English, with no native Spanish support, no fiat-denominated pricing, and no country-specific localization features for regulatory compliance or currency display.

The platform is primarily in English, with pricing and fees displayed in USD; it lacks full localization into regional languages or regulatory-specific setups—so users outside major English-speaking markets might face interface and compliance gaps.

App Quality & Stability

Raydium’s mobile app supports full DeFi functionality with a smooth interface and high responsiveness; while exact crash metrics aren’t published, user feedback indicates consistent performance and frequent feature refinements.

ABCC doesn’t offer an official mobile app; instead, it operates via a responsive web interface optimized for mobile browsers. This avoids crash-related issues but means offline or dedicated-app functionality is not available.

Experience, Performance & Ecosystem

UX/UI

Raydium’s revamped V3 interface delivers a cleaner, more intuitive navigation, consolidating pools, dashboards, and portfolio elements into one layout; while it doesn’t offer separate “Lite” or “Pro” modes, the design balances simplicity for newcomers with advanced routing features beneficial to experienced DeFi users.

ABCC features a clean and intuitive interface that users—whether beginners or pros—find easy to navigate; however, it lacks explicit “Lite” or “Pro” interface modes, opting instead for a unified design with customizable dashboard elements that streamline access to tools and charts.

Performance

With Solana’s high throughput under the hood, Raydium provides fast order execution and smooth interface performance, though network congestion on Solana can occasionally introduce delays during extreme volatility or high-traffic periods.

The platform is built on a high-speed trading architecture that supports fast order execution, even during volatile markets, and its streamlined onboarding process helps avoid lengthy KYC delays—though official metrics for latency or queue times are not provided.

Education

Raydium offers educational content through its Academy and governance forums, but lacks built-in demo or simulator tools and has limited Spanish-language resources, relying mostly on English documentation and community translations.

ABCC does provide helpful beginner guides within its Help Centre available in multiple languages—including Spanish—but it does not offer a trading simulator or demo account; instead, it focuses on written resources to guide users.

Community

Raydium maintains an active base across Discord, Telegram, Twitter, and governance town halls, fostering strong community engagement and support—though it doesn’t currently offer a formal referral program.

ABCC engages its user base through official channels like Telegram and occasionally runs referral campaigns tied to trading incentives, although it doesn’t maintain a public forum or Discord, concentrating community interaction primarily through these social touchpoints.

Integrations

Raydium supports SDK and API access, allowing third-party integration with tax platforms, external bots, and accounting tools; however, it lacks native TradingView integration, so charting relies on built-in graph elements or external platforms.

The trading interface is powered by native TradingView charts, enhancing technical analysis capabilities, but ABCC doesn’t offer integration with external trading bots, tax tools, or accounting platforms—it remains focused on core trading functionality.

Who Each One Is Best For

Raydium shines for users immersed in the Solana ecosystem who value fast, composable DeFi trading and liquidity tools, while casual crypto users or those seeking multi-chain, fiat-based simplicity may find interfaces like centralized exchanges or cross-chain DEXs more accessible.

ABCC is best suited for traders who prioritize a straightforward, secure trading environment with real-time charting and fast execution—and who don’t rely on advanced educational features or third-party tool integrations—making it a solid choice for active spot traders seeking efficiency and simplicity.