Trading212 vs 50X: Fees, Security, Features & Which to Choose (2025)

Trying to choose between Trading212 and 50X This side-by-side comparison reveals total cost (fees + spreads), security & licenses, coins/derivatives, deposits/withdrawals, and app quality. In 2 minutes you’ll see who wins for beginners, active traders, and long-term holders. Clear pros/cons, a quick verdict, and safe links to get started.

Last updated on August 23, 2025

Trading212

50X

⚠️ We look for what’s best for you.

₿ Getting into crypto? With eToro you can start in minutes: buy/sell top coins, set recurring buys, track markets, and use Social/CopyTrader features.

👉 Start here and explore the crypto offer.

Available Countries

United States

Europe

Yes

Latin America

Yes

India

China

Canada

United Kingdom

Yes

United States

Yes

Europe

Yes

Latin America

Yes

India

China

Canada

Yes

United Kingdom

Thinking about starting with crypto? This is for you.

In select regions, eToro offers a $10 welcome bonus when you open an account today.*

🎯 An account built to help you start with crypto—without the hassle.

➕ Buy and sell top cryptocurrencies in minutes

➕ Recurring buys, price alerts, and advanced charts

➕ Social/CopyTrader™ to follow experienced investors

➕ One of the largest and most trusted platforms worldwide

Limited-time promotion — still available.

*Offer subject to terms, eligibility and regional availability. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest.

Trading212 is ideal if:

Great if you want hands-off investing – Trading 212 offers features like automated “Pies” portfolios and recurring contributions to simplify building a diversified portfolio.
Ideal for multi-currency flexibility – You can hold and invest in multiple currencies within a single account, which helps reduce foreign exchange friction.
Best suited for casual or beginner investors – The platform’s intuitive interface, fractional share access, and educational tools make it a friendly environment for those starting out or preferring simplicity.

50X is ideal if:

Instant coin-to-coin trades — You can swap any listed cryptocurrency directly for any other in a single transaction using its unique Any-to-Any trading core, without extra conversion steps.
Passive income through native tokens — Holding STE or A2A tokens entitles you to profit-sharing or dividend-style earnings from the platform’s performance.
Advanced trader tools with liquidity boost — The platform offers professional-grade interfaces, customizable layouts, and aggregates liquidity from major exchanges to enhance execution and depth.

Trading212 isn’t ideal if:

Not for advanced traders seeking sophisticated tools – lacks algorithmic trading, advanced order types, and third-party platforms like MT4/MT5.
Limited asset variety available – missing options like bonds, mutual funds, options, and has a narrow selection of cryptocurrencies.
CFDs carry high risk and hidden costs – volatility-prone leveraged instruments, wider spreads, and FX conversion expenses may deter cautious or risk-averse investors.

50X isn’t ideal if:

Liquidity limitations — Lower trading volumes can result in occasional liquidity tightness, which may affect large or rapid trades.
No fiat access or KYC — You won't be able to fund your account with traditional currencies or use fiat deposits and withdrawals in the usual way.
Offshore registration — Its incorporation in an offshore jurisdiction may offer less regulatory protection and oversight compared to more regulated platforms.

Fees & Total Costs

Spot Maker/Take

Trading 212 doesn’t operate on a typical maker/taker fee model or tiered volumes, nor does it offer discounts using a native token—fees are built into spreads and FX conversions, keeping the pricing straightforward and flat across all users.

50 X charges the same flat 0.20 % fee for both maker and taker spot trades; holding and paying with the internal A2A token for applicable pairs (like A2A/BTC or A2A/ETH) cuts that fee in half.

Futures/Derivatives

Trading 212 does not provide traditional futures or derivatives with maker/taker pricing or funding rates; instead, it offers CFDs with dynamic spreads and overnight holding fees, avoiding explicit derivative-style fee structures.

For futures contracts on 50 X, both maker and taker fees are effectively zero, but as with most platforms, funding fees apply periodically to align futures prices with spot.

Average Spreads on Liquid Pairs

While specific BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT spreads aren’t published publicly, Trading 212’s CFD spreads are dynamic and vary based on market conditions—more liquid instruments tend to carry narrower spreads, visible directly in the app’s instrument details.

The platform’s “Any-to-Any” matching and relatively low volume can widen average spreads on major pairs compared to high-liquidity competitors.

Fiat Deposits & Withdrawals

Trading 212 supports multiple deposit and withdrawal methods—bank transfers, cards, e-wallets, etc.—typically with no service charges, and withdrawals are often processed quickly by the platform, though third-party or bank processing fees may apply depending on your provider and location.

There are no direct fiat deposit or withdrawal options—though you can buy USDT via a third-party gateway using cards or Advcash, but the fees vary significantly and are set by the provider.

On-chain Withdrawals

Trading 212 does not support on-chain crypto withdrawals (e.g., to external wallets on Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRX networks), so there are no network-based fees to report.

50 X applies fixed withdrawal fees per crypto and network—e.g. modest flat fees for BTC, ETH, XRP—rather than dynamic per-network pricing.

Hidden Costs

While Trading 212 charges no inactivity or express KYC fees, the primary less-obvious cost comes from its currency conversion fee whenever you trade or fund in a currency different from your account base—this is the main “hidden” expense to watch.

You won’t face inactivity or KYC express charges, but currency conversion and payment-gateway fees (when buying via card) can be steep and are charged externally.

Real-World Cost Example: “€500 BTC

Let’s say you purchase €500 worth of BTC via Trading 212’s CFD interface—your cost includes the dynamic spread embedded in the buying price plus a small FX conversion if your account isn’t denominated in euros, making up the total cost you’ll see reflected after execution.

If you spent €500 to acquire BTC, you’d pay the platform’s spot fee (≈0.20 %), absorb the BTC/fiat spread from the gateway, and then pay the fixed network fee to withdraw on-chain.

Crypto Offering & Trading Features

Number of Coins & Pairs

Trading 212 no longer offers direct cryptocurrency trading; previously it provided a limited selection of major crypto CFDs (roughly 10–15), without extensive pair support or detailed volume rankings available to users.

50 X offers around 24 cryptocurrencies and roughly 105 trading pairs in total; their top 20 pairs by volume typically include BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT, LTC/USDT, TRX/ETH, LINK/USDT, XRP/USDC, and other active altcoin-to-cryptocurrency combinations.

Product Range

Trading 212 currently offers only CFD-based cryptocurrency exposure—no spot crypto, margin, perpetuals, options, crypto ETFs, staking, lending, copy trading, grid bots, or automatic DCA are available.

The platform focuses on spot trading and spot-margin (leveraged crypto-to-crypto), and also offers perpetual futures via A2A liquidity, token-based passive income (through dividends and managed accounts), but doesn’t provide options, crypto ETFs, savings staking, lending, copy trading, grid bots, or automated DCA tools.

Liquidity

As Trading 212 doesn’t support actual crypto spot markets, there’s no public data for liquidity, 24-hour volumes, or order-book depth for BTC or ETH—you’re instead trading over-the-counter CFDs.

Trading volume on 50 X remains modest—24-hour volume is under $100k—so book depth on BTC/ETH pairs is relatively shallow, leading to potential slippage or less depth during larger trades.

Tools

Trading 212 includes basic tools like limit and stop orders and charting on web/mobile, plus alerts and AutoInvest functionality, but lacks advanced features such as OCO orders, native TradingView integration, or a public API/WebSocket.

You’ll find essential order types like limit, market, stop-loss, and trailing stops with charting tools integrated into the interface; there’s support for API and WebSocket access, but there’s no fully integrated TradingView experience or alerting system built in.

Geographic Restrictions by Product

Certain products—especially crypto and crypto-derivative CFDs—are restricted in some regions like the UK due to local regulation, although crypto CFD access is expanding in jurisdictions with CySEC oversight.

Derivatives and margin are generally accessible globally, but some countries with strict crypto regulations may not have full access; the platform doesn’t explicitly list those banned regions.

Innovation

Trading 212 doesn’t offer features like launchpads or launchpools nor differentiated earn products (flexible vs locked); innovation has focused instead on user-friendly automation tools like Pies and AutoInvest.

50 X brings innovation in its Any-to-Any core and dividend token model allowing passive income through profit-sharing or token loans, but it does not currently support launchpad/pool projects or offer separate flexible vs locked earning products.

Security, Regulation & Custody

Operating Entity & Jurisdiction

The platform operates through several legally registered entities—Trading 212 UK Ltd (UK, regulated by the FCA), Trading 212 Markets Ltd (Cyprus, regulated by CySEC), FXFlat Bank GmbH (Germany, regulated by BaFin), and a branch in Australia (ASIC oversight)—all under the umbrella of Trading 212 Group Limited, founded in 2004 with current headquarters in London.

Operated by Smart Token Exchange LTD, established in 2017 and headquartered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, this offshore structure allows for privacy but offers limited regulatory oversight.

Licenses/Registration

Trading 212 is authorised under major financial regulators: FCA in the UK, CySEC in the EU (subject to MiFID II), BaFin in Germany, and ASIC in Australia; while it is not a VASP, its EU operations align with MiCA’s regulatory architecture.

The platform does not hold formal regulatory licenses such as VASP or MiCA/UE; it functions under the jurisdiction of its offshore registry without public regulatory accreditation.

Custody

Client assets and cash are held in segregated accounts with trusted third-party custodians—such as Interactive Brokers and Bank of New York Mellon—with daily reconciliations and both internal and external audits by firms like Buzzacott; there’s no public Proof of Reserves or cold storage percentage disclosed.

Assets are custodial on the platform, though it claims 98 % of funds are kept in cold storage and a small share is hot for liquidity; there’s no publicly available proof-of-reserves or third-party audit confirmation.

Insurance & Protection Funds

Clients benefit from compensation schemes: up to £85,000 under the UK’s FSCS via FCA regulation, up to €20,000 under the ICF in Cyprus via CySEC, and coverage under Germany’s EdW scheme via BaFin; in addition, CySEC-covered clients may receive extra insurance up to €1M per client.

The exchange mentions insurance coverage and security provisions, but no clear details are provided on the scope, provider, or coverage limits of such protection.

Incident History

Trading 212 maintains a largely clean track record; there are no publicly reported major hacks, platform-wide freezes, or regulatory fines—a testament to its stable operations and longstanding regulatory compliance.

There are no publicly known major security breaches or regulatory penalties, though occasional user reports mention withdrawal delays and some technical hiccups in trading operations.

Risk Controls

The platform offers standard protections such as two-factor authentication, anti-phishing advice, and strong infrastructure defence (like WAFs, DDoS mitigation, and penetration testing), though it lacks sub-account segregation or granular API permission options for users.

Security features include enforced two-factor authentication (3-factor via Google Auth), customizable withdrawal delays, address whitelisting, and emergency master keys; granular API permissions and anti-phishing tools are not explicitly detailed.

Transparency

Trading 212 publishes annual financial statements and audit oversight but does not offer public wallet addresses or monthly reporting for users, nor a formal service-level agreement (SLA) publicly—though its regulatory disclosures offer a degree of transparency.

The platform does not publish regular transparency reports, public wallet addresses, or formal service-level agreements—transparency remains limited to user-facing guides and token dividend mechanisms.

Deposits, Withdrawals, KYC & Support

Fiat Deposit Methods

Users can fund accounts via a wide range of payment methods—including bank transfers, instant bank transfers, cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, iDEAL, and regional options like Carte Bleue or Blik; minimum amounts depend on account type but generally must be whole numbers (with exceptions for specific formats like ISA), and deposits are credited swiftly depending on method and region.

No direct fiat transfers, bank cards, or e-wallets are supported for deposit; only crypto deposits are accepted, and the timing depends on blockchain confirmation speeds.

Supported Fiat Currencies & Conversion

No direct fiat transfers, bank cards, or e-wallets are supported for deposit; only crypto deposits are accepted, and the timing depends on blockchain confirmation speeds.

KYC (Verification Levels)

The platform enforces mandatory verification procedures that align with AML regulation; while they don’t advertise tiered KYC levels (like Basic/Advanced) publicly, completing verification fully—including adding and verifying payment methods—lifts limitations on withdrawals and access to features.

No KYC is required—there’s no basic or advanced verification, allowing full functionality without identity disclosure.

Withdrawals

Withdrawals must respect the original deposit method and are subject to method-specific limits until verification is complete; typical processing takes up to three business days, followed by transfer times that vary by provider—there’s no crypto-on-chain withdrawal functionality, so network distinctions like ERC-20 or TRC-20 don’t apply.

Cryptocurrency withdrawals are allowed across supported networks like ERC-20, but fiat withdrawals aren’t supported; processing time depends on network congestion, with dynamic fees reflecting real-time blockchain conditions.

Customer Support

Support is accessible via the app’s “Contact us” button or official form, and also by email or community forums; live chat availability fluctuates based on load, response times can vary during high volume, but there’s an extensive self-help knowledge base with detailed guidance on common queries.

Support is available via email and Telegram chat, with varied response times—community-created guides serve as informal knowledge resources since no official 24/7 live support is guaranteed.

Languages & Localization

The app interface supports multiple languages—including native Spanish—so users can navigate in their preferred language, with fees and amounts displayed in their account’s currency (e.g., euros), and client services and regulation adapted to each user’s jurisdiction based on where they register.

The interface is available in English and other languages, displays amounts in common fiat like USD/EUR via third-party gateways, but lacks localization or regulatory adaptations for specific jurisdictions.

App Quality & Stability

Trading 212’s apps are regularly updated across iOS and Android, with stability improved over time via interface enhancements like streamlined withdrawal flows; while there’s no public crash rate figure, development notes suggest a focus on reliability and responsiveness.

There’s no dedicated mobile app—users rely entirely on the web interface, which shows regular updates on the site and supports stable performance without known crash issues.

Experience, Performance & Ecosystem

UX/UI

Trading 212 delivers an intuitive interface that lets users switch effortlessly between Invest and CFD modes, with a low barrier to entry for beginners; while there’s no official “Lite/Pro” toggle yet, a community-proposed “Pro mode” aimed at power users is under review.

The interface presents a learning curve due to its rich functionality and customization options, including color theming and layout flexibility, but doesn’t explicitly offer separate “Lite” or “Pro” modes; instead, it adapts dynamically for both beginner and advanced users, though novices may feel slightly overwhelmed at first.

Performance

Overall, Trading 212 offers consistent execution speeds and reliable uptime, though users sometimes note interface sluggishness during sharp market moves—and while onboarding may lag in surges, there’s no widespread record of platform crashes during volatility peaks.

The platform performs quickly due to its single-page application design and responsive internal core, although lower liquidity may lead to slowed fills or slippage during high volatility; since there’s no KYC, there’s no issue with verification queues.

Education

The platform features an unlimited, fully functional demo that mirrors both Invest and CFD accounts, complete with virtual capital and integrated tutorials, making it excellent for learning; it also offers educational resources in multiple languages, including Spanish.

There’s no formal academy or demo environment; educational content comes via guides and third-party reviews, primarily available in English—Spanish-language resources are limited or largely community-generated rather than official.

Community

Trading 212 supports an active community via its official user forums where updates, feedback, and tips circulate; while there’s no public Discord or Telegram channel, a referral program enables users to invite peers—usually offering bonuses or perks in return.

An active Telegram channel serves as the main community hub, and their multilevel referral program offers generous commission-sharing incentives—no official forums or Discord are indicated.

Integrations

Although advanced chart layouts on mobile have improved, and web charting is robust, Trading 212 lacks built-in TradingView integration, external bot support, or direct tax/accounting tool integrations—so users manage analytics and reporting separately.

Charts use TradingView’s charting library, and the platform supports API access for external trading bots; however, it lacks built-in tax compliance or portfolio/accounting integrations.

Who Each One Is Best For

Trading 212 is ideal for beginners and buy-and-hold investors focused on simplicity, fractional investing, and automated portfolio building; it may feel limiting to professional or algorithmic traders who require advanced customization, deep integrations, or high-speed execution.

It’s best suited for proactive crypto traders who value fast, flexible coin-to-coin swaps and deep interface customization; casual users or those needing built-in demo tools, fiat support, or simplified dashboards may find it less immediately accessible.