Trading212 vs Poloniex: Fees, Security, Features & Which to Choose (2025)

Trying to choose between Trading212 and Poloniex This side-by-side comparison reveals total cost (fees + spreads), security & licenses, coins/derivatives, deposits/withdrawals, and app quality. In 2 minutes you’ll see who wins for beginners, active traders, and long-term holders. Clear pros/cons, a quick verdict, and safe links to get started.

Last updated on August 21, 2025

trading 212

Trading212

poloniex

Poloniex

⚠️ We look for what’s best for you.

Getting into crypto? With eToro you can start in minutes: buy/sell top coins, set recurring buys, track markets, and use Social/CopyTrader features.

👉 Start here and explore the crypto offer.

Table of Contents

Available Countries

United States

No

Europe

Yes

Latin America

Yes

India

No

China

No

Canada

No

United Kingdom

Yes
No

United States

Yes

Europe

Yes

Latin America

Yes

India

No

China

Yes

Canada

No

United Kingdom

Thinking about starting with crypto? This is for you.

In select regions, eToro offers a $10 welcome bonus when you open an account today.*

🎯 An account built to help you start with crypto—without the hassle.

➕ Buy and sell top cryptocurrencies in minutes

➕ Recurring buys, price alerts, and advanced charts

➕ Social/CopyTrader™ to follow experienced investors

➕ One of the largest and most trusted platforms worldwide

etoro logo.webp

Limited-time promotion — still available.

*Offer subject to terms, eligibility and regional availability. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest.

Trading212 is ideal if:

Poloniex is ideal if:

Trading212 isn’t ideal if:

Poloniex isn’t ideal if:

Fees & Total Costs

Spot Maker/Take

Trading 212 doesn’t operate on a typical maker/taker fee model or tiered volumes, nor does it offer discounts using a native token—fees are built into spreads and FX conversions, keeping the pricing straightforward and flat across all users.
Poloniex applies a tiered fee structure based on your 30-day trading volume, where higher tiers reduce both maker and taker fees; if you hold TRX in your account, you qualify for an additional discount on those trading fees.

Futures/Derivatives

Trading 212 does not provide traditional futures or derivatives with maker/taker pricing or funding rates; instead, it offers CFDs with dynamic spreads and overnight holding fees, avoiding explicit derivative-style fee structures.
Futures trading on Poloniex charges a flat maker and taker fee regardless of volume—with maker lower than taker—and while funding rates apply to perpetuals, they are variable and not fixed in the fee table.

Average Spreads on Liquid Pairs

While specific BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT spreads aren’t published publicly, Trading 212’s CFD spreads are dynamic and vary based on market conditions—more liquid instruments tend to carry narrower spreads, visible directly in the app’s instrument details.
Poloniex generally offers competitive spreads on high-liquidity pairs like BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT, benefiting from its maker-taker model that promotes tighter order book pricing.

Fiat Deposits & Withdrawals

Trading 212 supports multiple deposit and withdrawal methods—bank transfers, cards, e-wallets, etc.—typically with no service charges, and withdrawals are often processed quickly by the platform, though third-party or bank processing fees may apply depending on your provider and location.
You can buy crypto using fiat via integrated third-party gateways such as Simplex or Mercuryo (cards, bank transfer, Apple Pay, etc.); expect a percentage fee and relatively quick fund availability, but withdrawal to fiat isn’t native and must be handled via these services too.

On-chain Withdrawals

Trading 212 does not support on-chain crypto withdrawals (e.g., to external wallets on Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRX networks), so there are no network-based fees to report.
Crypto withdrawals incur a fixed network fee per asset—these vary by blockchain and may adjust with network congestion; you choose the network (e.g., BTC, ETH, TRX) and Poloniex displays the current cost before confirming the withdrawal.

Hidden Costs

While Trading 212 charges no inactivity or express KYC fees, the primary less-obvious cost comes from its currency conversion fee whenever you trade or fund in a currency different from your account base—this is the main “hidden” expense to watch.
Beyond trading and withdrawal fees, there can be conversion costs when using fiat, indirect costs via third-party gateways, and potential eligibility or limit differences tied to KYC status—but Poloniex doesn’t charge inactivity or express processing fees explicitly.

Real-World Cost Example: “€500 BTC

Let’s say you purchase €500 worth of BTC via Trading 212’s CFD interface—your cost includes the dynamic spread embedded in the buying price plus a small FX conversion if your account isn’t denominated in euros, making up the total cost you’ll see reflected after execution.
Suppose you buy €500 worth of BTC via a card gateway—you’d face a gateway fee percentage on top, then the trading fee plus a modest spread, and if you decide to withdraw the BTC on-chain afterward, you’d pay the network fee for that blockchain, all combined.

Crypto Offering & Trading Features

Number of Coins & Pairs

Trading 212 no longer offers direct cryptocurrency trading; previously it provided a limited selection of major crypto CFDs (roughly 10–15), without extensive pair support or detailed volume rankings available to users.
Poloniex supports over 700 to 770 cryptocurrencies and around 700 to 840 trading pairs; among the top 20 by trading volume, pairs like BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT, XRP/USDT, SOL/USDT, DOGE/USDT dominate, typically accounting for a significant share of the 24-hour volume.

Product Range

Trading 212 currently offers only CFD-based cryptocurrency exposure—no spot crypto, margin, perpetuals, options, crypto ETFs, staking, lending, copy trading, grid bots, or automatic DCA are available.
Poloniex offers spot trading, margin and perpetual futures (with up to 100x leverage), staking/earn programs, lending services, futures copy trading, spot and futures grid bots, and DCA-style automated strategies—though it does not provide crypto ETFs or options natively.

Liquidity

As Trading 212 doesn’t support actual crypto spot markets, there’s no public data for liquidity, 24-hour volumes, or order-book depth for BTC or ETH—you’re instead trading over-the-counter CFDs.
Poloniex’s 24-hour trading volume generally ranges between ~$800 M and over $1.2 B, with BTC/USDT alone often seeing hundreds of millions daily, and ETH/USDT also attracting strong liquidity; while exact order-book depth data isn’t public, the high volumes imply solid market depth.

Tools

Trading 212 includes basic tools like limit and stop orders and charting on web/mobile, plus alerts and AutoInvest functionality, but lacks advanced features such as OCO orders, native TradingView integration, or a public API/WebSocket.
The platform supports advanced order types like limit, stop, and potentially OCO (One-Cancels-Other), provides real-time charts and advanced technical analysis tools, and offers API and WebSocket access; though it does not explicitly integrate TradingView natively, charting is robust.

Geographic Restrictions by Product

Certain products—especially crypto and crypto-derivative CFDs—are restricted in some regions like the UK due to local regulation, although crypto CFD access is expanding in jurisdictions with CySEC oversight.
Certain services—especially derivatives like margin and futures—are restricted in specific regions; notably, U.S. residents cannot access any Poloniex services, and other jurisdictions may face similar limitations.

Innovation

Trading 212 doesn’t offer features like launchpads or launchpools nor differentiated earn products (flexible vs locked); innovation has focused instead on user-friendly automation tools like Pies and AutoInvest.
Poloniex shows innovation through features like LaunchBase (token sales platform) and a flexible staking/earn framework, offering both open-term (flexible) and potentially locked-earn options, although detailed mechanics may vary.

Security, Regulation & Custody

Operating Entity & Jurisdiction

The platform operates through several legally registered entities—Trading 212 UK Ltd (UK, regulated by the FCA), Trading 212 Markets Ltd (Cyprus, regulated by CySEC), FXFlat Bank GmbH (Germany, regulated by BaFin), and a branch in Australia (ASIC oversight)—all under the umbrella of Trading 212 Group Limited, founded in 2004 with current headquarters in London.
Poloniex is operated by Poloniex, LLC, originally founded in 2014, headquartered in Delaware (with a principal business location in Massachusetts), and ultimately owned by Polo Digital Assets, Ltd. based in Seychelles.

Licenses/Registration

Trading 212 is authorised under major financial regulators: FCA in the UK, CySEC in the EU (subject to MiFID II), BaFin in Germany, and ASIC in Australia; while it is not a VASP, its EU operations align with MiCA’s regulatory architecture.
Poloniex is not officially licensed or registered as a VASP in regulated jurisdictions and has previously faced enforcement actions for operating without registrations under U.S. securities laws, notably settling with the SEC for operating an unregistered exchange.

Custody

Client assets and cash are held in segregated accounts with trusted third-party custodians—such as Interactive Brokers and Bank of New York Mellon—with daily reconciliations and both internal and external audits by firms like Buzzacott; there’s no public Proof of Reserves or cold storage percentage disclosed.
Poloniex maintains full proof-of-reserves using a Merkle tree system and publishes monthly reserve snapshots, starting with TRX; while traditional third-party audits or detailed cold-storage percentages aren’t publicly disclosed, the reserve transparency program is a step toward accountability.

Insurance & Protection Funds

Clients benefit from compensation schemes: up to £85,000 under the UK’s FSCS via FCA regulation, up to €20,000 under the ICF in Cyprus via CySEC, and coverage under Germany’s EdW scheme via BaFin; in addition, CySEC-covered clients may receive extra insurance up to €1M per client.
The platform does not advertise a dedicated insurance fund or similar institutional-level protection to cover user losses from breaches or insolvency.

Incident History

Trading 212 maintains a largely clean track record; there are no publicly reported major hacks, platform-wide freezes, or regulatory fines—a testament to its stable operations and longstanding regulatory compliance.
Poloniex settled a major enforcement case with OFAC over sanctions violations and with the SEC for unregistered operations; additionally, it endured a large hot-wallet breach in late 2023 that reportedly resulted in over $114 million in user losses.

Risk Controls

The platform offers standard protections such as two-factor authentication, anti-phishing advice, and strong infrastructure defence (like WAFs, DDoS mitigation, and penetration testing), though it lacks sub-account segregation or granular API permission options for users.
The exchange offers standard security tools including mandatory two-factor authentication (2FA), email freezing, anti-phishing guidance, and users are encouraged to manage account history and log out sessions manually; information on sub-accounts or granular API permissioning is not prominent.

Transparency

Trading 212 publishes annual financial statements and audit oversight but does not offer public wallet addresses or monthly reporting for users, nor a formal service-level agreement (SLA) publicly—though its regulatory disclosures offer a degree of transparency.
Poloniex publishes its Proof-of-Reserves reports monthly and provides tools for users to verify their balances via Merkle proofs; however, it does not regularly publish monthly financial or operational reports, SLA terms, nor a public wallet trace log.

Deposits, Withdrawals, KYC & Support

Fiat Deposit Methods

Users can fund accounts via a wide range of payment methods—including bank transfers, instant bank transfers, cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, iDEAL, and regional options like Carte Bleue or Blik; minimum amounts depend on account type but generally must be whole numbers (with exceptions for specific formats like ISA), and deposits are credited swiftly depending on method and region.
Users can deposit fiat using third-party gateways like Simplex via credit/debit card, bank transfers, and e-wallets; limits and processing times depend on the gateway and user’s verification level, with weekly caps around $50,000 for deposits.

Supported Fiat Currencies & Conversion

Users can fund accounts via a wide range of payment methods—including bank transfers, instant bank transfers, cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay, iDEAL, and regional options like Carte Bleue or Blik; minimum amounts depend on account type but generally must be whole numbers (with exceptions for specific formats like ISA), and deposits are credited swiftly depending on method and region.
Users can deposit fiat using third-party gateways like Simplex via credit/debit card, bank transfers, and e-wallets; limits and processing times depend on the gateway and user’s verification level, with weekly caps around $50,000 for deposits.

KYC (Verification Levels)

The platform enforces mandatory verification procedures that align with AML regulation; while they don’t advertise tiered KYC levels (like Basic/Advanced) publicly, completing verification fully—including adding and verifying payment methods—lifts limitations on withdrawals and access to features.
Trading and basic withdrawals are accessible without completing KYC (Level 1), capped at modest daily limits; completing full verification (Level 2) unlocks higher withdrawal and trading limits and access to margin/futures.

Withdrawals

Withdrawals must respect the original deposit method and are subject to method-specific limits until verification is complete; typical processing takes up to three business days, followed by transfer times that vary by provider—there’s no crypto-on-chain withdrawal functionality, so network distinctions like ERC-20 or TRC-20 don’t apply.
Withdrawal limits scale with verification—Level 1 up to ~$10,000/day (higher with 2FA), Level 2 up to ~$1,000,000/day with 2FA and whitelisting; withdrawals are processed via supported blockchains like ERC-20, TRC-20, BEP-20, and timing varies with network congestion.

Customer Support

Support is accessible via the app’s “Contact us” button or official form, and also by email or community forums; live chat availability fluctuates based on load, response times can vary during high volume, but there’s an extensive self-help knowledge base with detailed guidance on common queries.
Poloniex offers support via email and a self-help knowledge base; live chat and multilingual support appear limited, leading to mixed reviews on response times and ticket resolution.

Languages & Localization

The app interface supports multiple languages—including native Spanish—so users can navigate in their preferred language, with fees and amounts displayed in their account’s currency (e.g., euros), and client services and regulation adapted to each user’s jurisdiction based on where they register.
The interface is available primarily in English, supports fiat display in USD/EUR among others, and relies on third-party providers for payment—local regulatory compliance varies by user location.

App Quality & Stability

Trading 212’s apps are regularly updated across iOS and Android, with stability improved over time via interface enhancements like streamlined withdrawal flows; while there’s no public crash rate figure, development notes suggest a focus on reliability and responsiveness.
The Poloniex mobile app is generally stable and regularly updated on major app stores, although a precise crash rate isn’t published; user feedback indicates occasional bugs, but overall smooth trading and wallet use.

Experience, Performance & Ecosystem

UX/UI

Trading 212 delivers an intuitive interface that lets users switch effortlessly between Invest and CFD modes, with a low barrier to entry for beginners; while there’s no official “Lite/Pro” toggle yet, a community-proposed “Pro mode” aimed at power users is under review.
The interface balances simplicity with depth—while it doesn’t offer explicit “Lite” or “Pro” modes, the design refresh has made navigation and core features more intuitive for newcomers, yet power users can still access advanced tools once familiar with the layout.

Performance

Overall, Trading 212 offers consistent execution speeds and reliable uptime, though users sometimes note interface sluggishness during sharp market moves—and while onboarding may lag in surges, there’s no widespread record of platform crashes during volatility peaks.
Poloniex enhanced performance with its backend overhaul and new trading engine, resulting in reduced latency and improved stability during normal trading; however, very high-volatility periods may still challenge order execution speed, and user reports suggest occasional delays in KYC processing during bull markets.

Education

The platform features an unlimited, fully functional demo that mirrors both Invest and CFD accounts, complete with virtual capital and integrated tutorials, making it excellent for learning; it also offers educational resources in multiple languages, including Spanish.
While Poloniex lacks a dedicated trading academy or demo simulator on its site, it provides multilingual support (including Spanish) via help articles and blog content to guide users, though comprehensive interactive learning tools aren’t currently offered.

Community

Trading 212 supports an active community via its official user forums where updates, feedback, and tips circulate; while there’s no public Discord or Telegram channel, a referral program enables users to invite peers—usually offering bonuses or perks in return.
Poloniex fosters community engagement through its Referral Center with multi-tier reward programs, ambassador levels offering commission boosts and even airdrops; it also maintains official Telegram and social media channels for announcements and community interaction.

Integrations

Although advanced chart layouts on mobile have improved, and web charting is robust, Trading 212 lacks built-in TradingView integration, external bot support, or direct tax/accounting tool integrations—so users manage analytics and reporting separately.
The exchange supports bot integrations and external strategies via CCXT-certified APIs; automated bot services (e.g. DCA bots with trading signal support) are in use, and data compatibility with tax tools like Crypto Tax Calculator allows users to export trade history via API or CSV for tax reporting.

Who Each One Is Best For

Trading 212 is ideal for beginners and buy-and-hold investors focused on simplicity, fractional investing, and automated portfolio building; it may feel limiting to professional or algorithmic traders who require advanced customization, deep integrations, or high-speed execution.
Poloniex is ideal for users who appreciate advanced trading tools with moderate learning curve, enjoy automated bot trading, and prefer a platform that supports integrations—while still being accessible to reasonably tech-savvy beginners—not as suited for those seeking built-in educational simulations or ultra-simplified interfaces.
Best platforms to invest in cryptocurrencies

📈 Millions already choose eToro for crypto investing online

Buy and sell top coins in minutes — recurring buys, price alerts, advanced charts

See why it ranks #1 in our head-to-head comparisons

Cryptoassets are highly volatile and unregulated in some regions. No consumer protection. Tax may apply. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest.